Identify Big O time complexity of code or a described operation, grounded in a growth table comparing step counts across small, medium, and large inputs.
You are an instructor who refuses to leave Big O notation as an abstract symbol students memorize without meaning, because O(n) and O(n squared) only actually click once someone sees the real numbers those two grow into as input size increases, ten steps against a hundred at first glance and a thousand against a million once the input gets large. Work in [MODE:select:analyze my code,analyze a plain-English description of an operation] mode. If I chose analyze my code, my code is: [CODE] If I left [CODE] blank, ask me to paste it before doing anything else instead of inventing a snippet. Identify every loop, nested loop, and recursive call present, and for each one, state roughly how many times its body runs relative to the input size, called n. Combine these into the single dominant term that determines overall growth, since a function with both an O(n) part and an O(n squared) part is described by the larger one, and name the resulting complexity class, constant, logarithmic, linear, linearithmic, quadratic, or exponential, stated as O(1), O(log n), O(n), O(n log n), O(n squared), or O(2 to the n). If I chose analyze a plain-English description, my operation is [OPERATION], such as looping through a list once, a nested loop comparing every pair in a list, binary search on a sorted list, or looking up a value in a hash map. Reason through the same way, how many basic steps does this operation take relative to the size of its input, and name the resulting complexity class. In either mode, once you have named the complexity class, build a small growth table showing the actual number of steps that complexity would take at three input sizes, n equal to 10, n equal to 100, and n equal to 10,000, so the difference between, for example, linear and quadratic growth is a real comparison of numbers rather than an abstract claim about which one is "faster." If the time complexity and the space complexity, meaning extra memory used, differ meaningfully for this code or operation, such as a sort that needs an additional array proportional to n, mention that difference briefly as a separate note rather than folding it into the time complexity explanation. Close by asking if I have a second piece of code or a second operation I want compared against the first, since seeing two complexity classes and their growth tables side by side is often what makes the practical difference between them concrete.
Use this prompt anywhere
10,000+ expert prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and wherever you use AI.
Get Early AccessO(n) and O(n squared) stay abstract right up until someone sees what they actually mean in real numbers, ten steps versus a hundred at a small input size, a thousand versus a million once the input gets large. Most explanations stop at the notation. This tool starts from your actual code or operation and ends at a real growth table.
Paste [CODE] and it identifies every loop, nested loop, and recursive call, estimates how many times each one runs relative to input size, and combines them into the single dominant term that determines overall growth, since a function with both a linear part and a quadratic part is described by the quadratic one. Or describe an [OPERATION] in plain English, looping through a list once, a nested loop comparing every pair, binary search on a sorted list, and get the same reasoning applied without needing actual code.
Every result ends with a growth table at three input sizes, 10, 100, and 10,000, so the difference between complexity classes becomes an actual comparison of step counts instead of an abstract claim about which one is faster. If space complexity, the extra memory an operation needs, differs meaningfully from its time complexity, that gets noted separately rather than folded into the same explanation. Run it in the Dock Editor to build a reference of analyzed complexity, pair with the algorithm explainer to see the reasoning applied across several algorithms, or the data structure explainer for how structure choice affects these same numbers.
Set [MODE] to analyze my code and paste a snippet into [CODE], or analyze a plain-English description and describe the operation in [OPERATION] instead.
Every loop, nested loop, and recursive call in your code gets identified with an estimate of how many times it runs relative to input size.
The parts combine into one overall complexity class, O(1) through O(2 to the n), based on whichever term grows fastest as input size increases.
See the actual number of steps that complexity class takes at three input sizes, 10, 100, and 10,000, turning the notation into a real number comparison.
Share a second snippet or description to see two complexity classes and their growth tables side by side.
Paste homework code and get its complexity class identified with the reasoning shown, plus a growth table that makes the abstract notation concrete.
Analyze two different solutions to the same problem, a loop-based approach against a nested-loop approach, and compare their growth tables side by side.
Build comfort reasoning about time complexity by analyzing your own past code and checking your intuition against the tool's step-by-step breakdown.
Run practice problems and past assignments through the tool to build speed at recognizing complexity classes from code structure alone.
Discover more prompts that could help with your workflow.
Build a small working program that calls a real public API, with the request, response, and API key setup explained step by step.
Explain a core functional programming idea, such as pure functions or immutability, with a broken code example and its fixed version shown side by side.
Explain a built-in math function, square root, power, absolute value, or rounding, covering math and syntax, then generate practice calls to predict before revealing results.
10,000+ expert-curated prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and wherever you use AI. Our extension helps any prompt deliver better results.