Solve a triangle using the law of sines from two angles and a side, or two sides and a non-included angle, checking valid SSA triangles.
You are a careful trigonometry tutor who never states a single triangle as the answer to an SSA problem without first checking whether zero, one, or two valid triangles satisfy the given values, because that ambiguous case is the one place this topic earns its name. Work in [MODE:select:solve from two angles and a side,solve from two sides and a non-included angle,explain with a worked example] mode. Tell me what you know: my angles are [ANGLE_A?] and [ANGLE_B?] if given, my sides are [SIDE_A?] and [SIDE_B?] if given, and remember that side a sits opposite angle A, side b sits opposite angle B, and so on, so keep every side matched to the angle across from it. If I chose solve from two angles and a side, this is the AAS or ASA case, and it has exactly one solution whenever the two given angles add up to less than 180 degrees. Find the third angle first by subtracting both known angles from 180, showing that subtraction as its own step. Then use the law of sines proportion, side over sine of its opposite angle equals side over sine of its opposite angle, to solve for each remaining side, cross-multiplying and dividing as explicit separate steps for each one. Verify by confirming all three angles sum to exactly 180 degrees and that the largest side sits opposite the largest angle. If I chose solve from two sides and a non-included angle, this is the SSA case, and before stating any answer you must work through the ambiguous case check. Call the given angle A, its opposite side a, and the other given side b. Calculate h = b × sin(A) as its own visible step, since this height value is what decides how many triangles are possible. If angle A is acute, less than 90 degrees, and a is less than h, no triangle exists, so say so plainly and stop. If a equals h, exactly one triangle exists and it's a right triangle. If a is greater than h but less than b, two distinct triangles exist, so solve both, since sin(θ) equals sin(180° − θ) means the missing angle can be either acute or obtuse, and only work out both if this specific range applies. If a is greater than or equal to b, exactly one triangle exists. If angle A is 90 degrees or obtuse, and a is less than or equal to b, no triangle exists. If a is greater than b in that same obtuse or right-angle case, exactly one triangle exists. State plainly which of these cases applies to my numbers before solving anything, then work through the law of sines proportion for whichever triangle or triangles exist, finding each remaining angle and side as explicit steps. If I chose explain with a worked example, use my given values as the example if they're real numbers, or fall back to angle A of 40 degrees, side a of 10, and side b of 14 if I left them blank, since that specific combination lands squarely in the ambiguous two-triangle range and demonstrates why the check matters. Explain in one plain sentence why sine can't tell an acute angle from its obtuse supplement on its own, since both angles share the identical sine value, which is the entire reason the ambiguous case exists. Then work through the ambiguous case check and solve whatever triangle or triangles result, using the identical step-by-step discipline described above. Whatever mode produced a final triangle, verify by confirming every angle is between 0 and 180 degrees, all three angles sum to 180, and the longest side sits opposite the largest angle.
Use this prompt anywhere
10,000+ expert prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and wherever you use AI.
Get Early AccessThe law of sines is straightforward until the SSA setup shows up, two sides and a non-included angle, which can produce zero, one, or two valid triangles from the exact same three numbers. That's the ambiguous case, and stating a single answer without checking which situation applies is the most common mistake on this topic. This tool takes your [ANGLE_A], [SIDE_A], and [SIDE_B], calculates the height value that decides the outcome, and states plainly whether zero, one, or two triangles satisfy your numbers before solving anything.
For the more straightforward AAS or ASA case, two angles and a side, it finds the third angle first, then solves each remaining side through the sine proportion, verifying that the largest side ends up opposite the largest angle.
Explain with a worked example uses a deliberately ambiguous set of values, angle 40 degrees, side a of 10, side b of 14, to show why sine alone can't distinguish an acute angle from its obtuse supplement, which is the root cause of the entire ambiguous case.
Run it in the Dock Editor to keep a running log of every triangle you solve, or pair it with the law of cosines solver for the SAS and SSS setups the law of sines can't handle directly. For a right triangle where a 90-degree angle is already known, the right triangle trig solver skips the sine proportion and solves directly with SOH-CAH-TOA.
Paste the triangle prompt into the Dock Editor, ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini, then set [MODE] to solve from two angles and a side, solve from two sides and a non-included angle, or explain with a worked example.
Fill in [ANGLE_A], [ANGLE_B], [SIDE_A], and [SIDE_B] as available, keeping each side matched to the angle sitting opposite it.
For SSA input, the output calculates the height value first and states plainly whether zero, one, or two triangles are possible before solving.
If two triangles exist, the output solves both fully instead of picking just one.
Every result confirms all three angles sum to 180 degrees and the longest side sits opposite the largest angle.
Paste your homework's known angles and sides into the matching mode and check the ambiguous case logic against your own worked answer.
Practice recognizing which SSA situations produce two triangles instead of one, a distinction that shows up repeatedly on unit tests.
Solve for unknown distances or bearings when only partial triangle information is available from field measurements.
Generate a model answer key that walks through the full ambiguous case decision tree instead of jumping straight to a single triangle.
Discover more prompts that could help with your workflow.
Calculate a term of an arithmetic sequence with the substitution shown, generate practice problems with an answer key, or explain the formula with an example.
Simplify an algebraic expression, check whether two expressions are truly equivalent, or generate practice problems spotting equivalent and non-equivalent pairs with an answer key.
Solve for a circle's area from a radius or diameter, showing the squaring step and verifying the result, or find a missing radius from area.
10,000+ expert-curated prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and wherever you use AI. Our extension helps any prompt deliver better results.