Generate LSAT Logical Reasoning questions that name the argument's gap first, then explain exactly why each wrong answer fails.
You are an LSAT Logical Reasoning tutor who treats every question as testing the same underlying skill, finding the gap between an argument's premises and its conclusion, then asking what fills, exploits, or matches that gap. Every LSAT Logical Reasoning question presents a short argument, and the question stem determines what to do with it. Strengthen and weaken questions ask what makes the gap between premises and conclusion bigger or smaller. Assumption and flaw questions ask what's silently required for the argument to work, or what's wrong with it as written. Inference and must be true questions ask what the given statements support without adding an assumption. Parallel reasoning questions ask which of five arguments shares the same underlying structure as the original. Generate [QUESTION_COUNT:number:5-25] questions of [QUESTION_TYPE:select:strengthen and weaken arguments,assumption and flaw questions,inference and must be true questions,parallel reasoning,mixed across all lr question types] at [DIFFICULTY:select:foundational with a clear obvious gap,realistic test day difficulty,advanced with a subtle or disguised gap]. Before the answer choices, state the argument's conclusion and its stated premises separately, then name the gap between them in one sentence, since spotting that gap fast is what separates a fast accurate answer from a slow guess. For each wrong answer choice, explain specifically why it fails, out of scope, reverses the logic, addresses the wrong part of the argument, rather than a generic wrong label. Track accuracy by [QUESTION_TYPE] across the session and flag whichever type has the lowest hit rate for the next practice round.
Range: 5 - 25
Use this prompt anywhere
10,000+ expert prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and wherever you use AI.
Get Early AccessWhat's the one skill every LSAT Logical Reasoning question actually tests? Finding the gap between an argument's premises and its conclusion, then doing something specific with that gap, strengthening it, weakening it, naming the hidden assumption that closes it, or spotting the flaw where it never gets closed at all.
Generate [QUESTION_COUNT] questions of [QUESTION_TYPE], strengthen and weaken, assumption and flaw, inference and must be true, or parallel reasoning, at [DIFFICULTY]. Every question states the argument's conclusion and premises separately before the answer choices, then names the gap in one sentence, since spotting that gap quickly is the actual skill test day rewards over raw reading speed.
Wrong answer explanations go beyond a generic wrong label, naming specifically whether a choice is out of scope, reverses the logic, or addresses the wrong part of the argument. Since Logical Reasoning now fills two of the three scored LSAT sections, weak spots here cost more than a weak Reading Comprehension section, covered separately in the reading comprehension practice generator. Run a full section with the LSAT practice test generator, or drill here inside the Dock Editor.
Run the LSAT Logical Reasoning prompt in Claude, Gemini, ChatGPT, or the Dock Editor, then set [QUESTION_TYPE] to one specific argument format or a mixed set.
Choose [QUESTION_COUNT] from 5 to 25 and set [DIFFICULTY] to build from an obvious gap toward a subtle, disguised one.
Write your own one sentence version of the conclusion, premises, and gap first, then compare it against the generated breakdown before looking at any choice.
Check which [QUESTION_TYPE] had the lowest hit rate this session and generate a focused follow-up set on that one type next.
Focus prep on Logical Reasoning now that it fills two of the three scored sections following Analytical Reasoning's removal.
Generate a focused follow-up set on whichever [QUESTION_TYPE] had the lowest hit rate in the last session instead of a generic mixed review.
Discover more prompts that could help with your workflow.
Generate LSAT Reading Comprehension passage sets with an answer key that quotes the exact supporting line for every answer.
Generate GED Math practice questions split into no-calculator and calculator-allowed sections with a full worked answer key
Generate TOEFL Writing practice across Build a Sentence, Write an Email, and Academic Discussion tasks with model responses and score-based feedback
10,000+ expert-curated prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and wherever you use AI. Our extension helps any prompt deliver better results.